Linking

Posts

Thinking from Penis

This post will be rather short and will answer - Do human males actually think from reproductive organ or any other any other animal males for that matter? Well answer for this question is kinda yes!. Well not actually from penis but atleast from balls or human testicles. Going behind the biology of this assertion of mine, one will observe that testis produce testosterone which is human male sex hormones. This hormone though bring long term changes in human males during puberty but as males reach the period of maturity this hormones influence the behavior rather then bring any prominent change. In the background testosterone is regulating the process of sperm production so it is essentially present in blood. The amount of this hormones directly influence the decision making of any male which is also depends on the environment perception of our brain. The biological wiring of leaving more progeny behind takes charge here and testosterone have greater influence over decisions which is be

Aligned Unity

The single biggest threat roaming around the heads of animals of this planet is Climate Change. I don't feel the need to state data what would happen if temperature rises above 1.5 deg. Celsius or any other figure. But one thing is true whatever is coming for us is dangerous. So, to counter this, Countries are assembling together to invest in green technology, clean fuels, etc. etc. let us keep the word green investment for all of this. Now, coming to the point of scrutiny of these development taking place, we can see the pattern of protectionism and imperialism in some areas. Let's take an example to justify my assertion, let us say European Union or any west country develops some sort of high tech machinery which dumps Carbon into ground and allows us to extract it back when required, or say nuclear fusion technology achieves exothermic stage by a single country. This country must have invested some amount to develop these tech, so it's obvious they will sought return on

Life is a Race

Ancient Scholars were keen to understand the purpose of life. They wanted to know why things are, what they are, this question gave rise to the religion and different scholarly opinion. But in this post I'm trying to explain another angle. Lets see, We all know, nature tends to test us again and again with its evolutionary forces. We have found proof stating presence of multiverse, which is constituted by many universe. This gigantic space is definitely not for humans and humans alone, or better say Earthians. Well this terminology will differ at every stage. The stages I'm talking about are like competition. As we know today, Climate change is the biggest threat driving the current phase of mass extinction. Isn't this like a mission in a game, where we try to find solution of the problem and head towards the next issue. If we succeed to established a cycle for our ecosystem leaving surplus as a result, aren't we a civilization who can go anywhere with some resources an

Unfortunate

About a week or two back, Chinese foreign minister visited Pakistan for OIC meeting. Where he showed his concern about the islamophobia persisting in Western world. The same west, which pampered Islam while changing it's cores, beliefs and created insecurity for it's own use. That insecurity turned into some really unfortunate events, leading to islamophobia. Now the same thing is being repeated, just the actors are changed now. When there was US spreading extremist ideas and insecurity in the Islamic world, now it's China. Well I'm an Indian and Chinese economy do create insecurity in me, it's also true that the actions China is performing to be the global leader involves shaping future of Islamic nations. The often quoted example of Uighur Muslims in Xinxiang stands firm to be an ironic tag in the face of Chinese. While China worries about the mentality in the west regarding Muslims, they often ignore the mental and physical torture of the people of Xinxiang. I be

Were Armchair Scientist Right?

In this post, we will take a basic derivation of Natural Selection - a theory by Charles Darwin. The armchair scientist is a term used for thinkers who depend on the researches provided to them. They interpret the work of others and try to give them shape for other causes. To start with, Charles Darwin wasn't one of them. He visited many areas and collected and sorted different types of samples. And gave a theory that changed our view of ours to see the course of evolution. He set us on the path to untangle the mystery of the diversity of life. One of the theories is Natural Selection or survival of the fittest. This theory says an organism that adapts to the changes in the environment better will have more chances to survive and stand against the odds. This theory unravelled the mystery of evolution; at least gave a direction towards it. This answered many questions; one such was - Is the rule of Britishers overseas justified? As a patriot, the answer is NO! , but for a m

Population Limiter

Have you seen any wildlife channels? Or any documentary on some island, forest, wildlife? Did you find any similarity based on sex or something familiar between humans and other animals regarding mating? Every species that exist on earth have a way to reproduce and create offspring of their own and continue the lineage. But if they continue to grow without check, don't you think they gonna exhaust resources really fast. Something nature doesn't like. So, as a primary check, they created competition for reproduction too. It sounds pretty usual, nothing shocking, right? Do you think bacteria have to compete to bud themselves out? That's sound so stupid. So, it came into the picture with the evolution that's a fact too. Yeah, I know nature has other ways to limit the exploitation of resources, but this one is exciting. Nature gave the power to check the population of species to the female part of the species. Well, I'm talking in general. Primarily, males have to attra

Brilliant Minds

What comes to your mind when we speak of brilliant minds? Albert Einstein? Stephan Hawking? Vinton Cerf? Bob Kahn? There are many names to say. Did they acquire that keen mind of their or they trained them? The thing is, we cannot be sure. After all, science has its language and so makes minds. Two types of mind one innately possess extraordinary capabilities and others who train themselves and push their limits. Nevertheless, these limits can be pushed to some extent only after that saturation comes or, say, and it went out of our hands. A movie named 'A man who knew infinity is based on the life of Srinivas Ramanujan. He was good with the number and contributed a lot in the field of Mathematics. However, what intriguing was that he was not trained or lectured by anyone. Moreover, on the contrary, there was G.H hardy who identified his work and helped him contribute to humanity. I am trying to say that if one deems to a person out of the above two, who will it be? My guess is Srin

Drugs As Weapons

We all know, how drugs affect our body, how they make us addict, how small-sighted it makes us and so on. These drugs can be helpful for some people inappropriate amount while prescribed by the doctor. But for an average person, it's harmful. Nowadays, it's cool doing drugs; for gen z, it's like the ultimate stage of being cool. But is it cool? I mean, who told you that it's cool doing drugs? Maybe you don't remember because it's a general idea. But who spread this idea, only someone making money out of it and who was it. They were imperialists earlier. Do you know there were wars called opium wars? Are you familiar with them? It's clear from the name that opium was a reason somehow. So, this war was between China and the Britishers. The Chinese market was not open to foreign powers, and they investigate imports via a single port. So, to open a call to them, Britishers smuggled opium in China along with their other goods. They made the Chinese population ad

Materialism

Toady we are living are having comfortable life when compared to earlier generation. But is it really comfortable? We have softer beds for better sleep, we have air conditioners to tackle adverse climatic conditions, fancy clothes to decorate our outer appearance to the world, we have different devices to playing games and relax our minds etc. These are comforts right? They appear quite ironic to me, air conditioners to tackle adverse climate condition, the conditions which we played with. Playing games on game devices to relax which really increase mental stress in long run. These all are part of materialism. The ideology of materialism states that everything including emotions can be represented physically. Now, what do you think, to which extent is it valid? There's a saying that money can't buy happiness, which contradicts this theory. Is it really true money can't buy happiness? I believe there are two types of happiness one which last for short duration and other whi

Nothing Stays Supreme Forever

Each and every process in this multiverse or beyond works according to a pattern, with certain rules, within limits. Many of these laws are interpreted by humans explaining their working. In fact, many phenomenon are predicted on the basis of that. But their very existence is still a question, yeah, I know there's a theory known as Big Bang Theory but it's still have a lot to prove and the particle in which that explosion occurred is still a big question. To simplify things to explain things for us, lets say some power decides the law how things work naming it nature because we gonna talk about political issues with some help of science. And the term nature will work just fine for us . This nature likes to experiment with everything that exists. So, it tries different types of approach to discover new things. Whenever this experiments reach at saturation it tries different approach to continue its experiment. As a result anything that exist never stays supreme forever. When som

Religion

When we human developed the sign of intelligence, a suffering came along with it - Curiosity. Our ancestor developed many things because of this curiosity and yeah many of them would have died in their journey to develop these things. The landmark event in the human history was the development of agriculture nearly 10,000 years ago. This development changed everything for humans, we started developing huge settlements because of this. Which ultimately brought the concept of land. Why I mentioned curiosity as suffering? Its because curiosity forced us to question. One who could answer these questions made us a believer in it. Now the brain which can answer question was given the duty to decide how things should be followed. How system should work and things like that. Our history tell us about great interpreter like Kautilya whose wisdom in running state still helps us. And there were people who answered the cosmologic

World As one

For the very first post, this topic isn't that bad I think. What I mean when I say World as one? It's simple sounding idea of creation of a universal system over world which make our world an egalitarian world. A world where we talk about about the future of human kind not the future of an individual race. Today, our world is politically divided into 195 pieces, calling individual piece a country. These pieces are interconnected in a very complex way every piece of this world get affected by the action of one, it obviously differ in intensity, duration, outcomes but this system sure impact every part of the world we can take the example of current conflict going on between Palestinians and Israelis. Whatever may be the reason of this conflicts whole world is getting affected by this, like barrier in the economic front as Israel exports high-technologies, cut diamond, etc to other parts of the world all these have to stop including the imports Israel bought affecting the econom