Skip to main content

Materialism

Toady we are living are having comfortable life when compared to earlier generation. But is it really comfortable? We have softer beds for better sleep, we have air conditioners to tackle adverse climatic conditions, fancy clothes to decorate our outer appearance to the world, we have different devices to playing games and relax our minds etc. These are comforts right? They appear quite ironic to me, air conditioners to tackle adverse climate condition, the conditions which we played with. Playing games on game devices to relax which really increase mental stress in long run. These all are part of materialism. The ideology of materialism states that everything including emotions can be represented physically. 


Now, what do you think, to which extent is it valid? There's a saying that money can't buy happiness, which contradicts this theory. Is it really true money can't buy happiness? I believe there are two types of happiness one which last for short duration and other which some how revives itself and give a sense of happiness again and again. The happiness lasting for shorter duration can be bought from money but the latter one can be achieved with our deeds, with near satisfaction, knowing what we have achieved in life accounts for good. 

The materialistic happiness need fellow or someone other than an individual to provide that happiness because this type of happiness can be felt when someone else appreciates. But the true happiness don't need any alibi to feel it, it comes from near self. For example, all the luxury we fantasise about like (at least I do) sports ca, big resident.. etc will they matter if society finds them usual? Once owning a T.V was luxury but today they are present in nearly every house. So, if we talk about a true egalitarian society, can an individual be happy if ideology of materialism is followed? The answer is no because we find this happiness because of other and when no will be there to appreciate it, these materialistic totem of happiness won't help.

Let us see another example, the great emperor Ashoka, was the most powerful king of his time. After the kaling yudh gave up everything and followed Buddhism. The reason for him was the deaths he caused because of wars. He had every luxury in his time but still gave up everything and followed the path of dharma. He was shadowed by the sadness which materialistic happiness couldn't overthrow. 

Have you ever made someone smiled because of you? Like passed a joke or done some charity and the result was before your eyes, the sense of providing. Doesn't it feels good? Don't you feel happy and satisfied. I believe the services which we provide, which don't harm us in anyway but give something to someone that is it path to be happy. 


Materialism is also an obstacle in the way to egalitarian world because till the time this fake sense of happiness, this fake sense of achieving, the physical form which depicts our achievements is there in our shelves, we can't find the true happiness.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unfortunate

About a week or two back, Chinese foreign minister visited Pakistan for OIC meeting. Where he showed his concern about the islamophobia persisting in Western world. The same west, which pampered Islam while changing it's cores, beliefs and created insecurity for it's own use. That insecurity turned into some really unfortunate events, leading to islamophobia. Now the same thing is being repeated, just the actors are changed now. When there was US spreading extremist ideas and insecurity in the Islamic world, now it's China. Well I'm an Indian and Chinese economy do create insecurity in me, it's also true that the actions China is performing to be the global leader involves shaping future of Islamic nations. The often quoted example of Uighur Muslims in Xinxiang stands firm to be an ironic tag in the face of Chinese. While China worries about the mentality in the west regarding Muslims, they often ignore the mental and physical torture of the people of Xinxiang. I be...

Drugs As Weapons

We all know, how drugs affect our body, how they make us addict, how small-sighted it makes us and so on. These drugs can be helpful for some people inappropriate amount while prescribed by the doctor. But for an average person, it's harmful. Nowadays, it's cool doing drugs; for gen z, it's like the ultimate stage of being cool. But is it cool? I mean, who told you that it's cool doing drugs? Maybe you don't remember because it's a general idea. But who spread this idea, only someone making money out of it and who was it. They were imperialists earlier.  Do you know there were wars called opium wars? Are you familiar with them? It's clear from the name that opium was a reason somehow. So, this war was between China and the Britishers. The Chinese market was not open to foreign powers, and they investigate imports via a single port. So, to open a call to them, Britishers smuggled opium in China along with their other goods. They made the Chinese population ad...