For the very first post, this topic isn't that bad I think. What I mean when I say World as one? It's simple sounding idea of creation of a universal system over world which make our world an egalitarian world. A world where we talk about about the future of human kind not the future of an individual race.
Today, our world is politically divided into 195 pieces, calling individual piece a country. These pieces are interconnected in a very complex way every piece of this world get affected by the action of one, it obviously differ in intensity, duration, outcomes but this system sure impact every part of the world we can take the example of current conflict going on between Palestinians and Israelis. Whatever may be the reason of this conflicts whole world is getting affected by this, like barrier in the economic front as Israel exports high-technologies, cut diamond, etc to other parts of the world all these have to stop including the imports Israel bought affecting the economy of opposite country. These conflicts only lead to waste of resources of the earth and disruption in the order.
If we talk about the reason behind this distribution of world into multiple pieces then it is an outcome of curiosity which nourishes the ultimate weapon of humans "Brain". The story can be traced back to ancient world but it would be of no use. We should be talking about the future of this planet. We have to understand there's not just the conflict between humans and humans but now nature is also at it's peak of anger which is again an outcome of our deeds. Why I'm talking about World as one is because in the near future there will be a time where these pieces have to decide whether to collect as one and help to survive the human kind or push each other before the anger of nature and finally collapse.
What World As One will look like? If these 195 pieces are collected together and form an union we can bring out the maximum potential of every part of the world. Like the area near equator can be used just for farming purposes which will help in feeding the whole population of earth. The parts where temperature don't support the growth of crops can be used for settlements. The barren lands can be used to manufacture things with proper technologies and recycling using minimum resources. Universal policies taking consideration of human species. I'm not suggesting to abandon the interest of individual and it's belief, some authority should be watching their interests and suggesting their needs to higher authority but ultimate decision should be taken by the universal bench in the interest of humans.
I understand what I'm saying appears to be unrealistic and fools word, but will we really have any other choice. I mean there are many policies and rules being made by different organisations to protect environment a way to ask mercy. But how many countries are complying with them? To state the facts, there was a agreement signed in Paris in 2015 which came into force in 2016 every country signed that agreement. That agreement was to bring down the temperature of earth by 1.5 Celsius but the global carbon footprint is increasing without brakes.
Today if we take human population under consideration nearly 22% of it lives in poverty. There are many organisations taking care of them but the question is - are they efficient at what they do? According to world bank half of them live only in 5 countries of the world. If we know we just need to emphasise on 5 countries and half of the poverty will be over why not 190 countries come together and help them eradicate this problem. Because we are divided among ourselves. Today we can not say, it is because of different race, but because of their backwardness due to their history. These problems would have been come to an end if human start to think as a species and come together for each other.
Can we say UN, can be that ultimate authority? The answer is NO. For the starters it don't have powers to bring justice and maintain international law and order. I know that they are still doing well but the participation of world is not there. Due to conflicts among each other, there's high chance of rejection of policy or bill just because of hatred. It doesn't matter how useful it can be. These dirty politics is also one of the major setback for UN to be a World Government. UN can act as pioneer for such authority but there are many reforms and redistribution of power needed to make it happen, which seems nearly impossible with the on going heat between super powers of our world, as they both are fighting for power and creation of world government is exactly opposite i.e., to give up a portion of power.
Comments
Post a Comment