Skip to main content

World As one

 For the very first post, this topic isn't that bad I think. What I mean when I say World as one? It's simple sounding idea of creation of a universal system over world which make our world an egalitarian world. A world where we talk about about the future of human kind not the future of an individual race.

Today, our world is politically divided into 195 pieces, calling individual piece a country. These pieces are interconnected in a very complex way every piece of this world get affected by the action of one, it obviously differ in intensity, duration, outcomes but this system sure impact every part of the world we can take the example of current conflict going on between Palestinians and Israelis. Whatever may be the reason of this conflicts whole world is getting affected by this, like barrier in the economic front as Israel exports high-technologies, cut diamond, etc to other parts of the world all these have to stop including the imports Israel bought affecting the economy of opposite country. These conflicts only lead to waste of resources of the earth and disruption in the order.

If we talk about the reason behind this distribution of world into multiple pieces then it is an outcome of curiosity which nourishes the ultimate weapon of humans "Brain". The story can be traced back to ancient world but it would be of no use. We should be talking about the future of this planet. We have to understand  there's not just the conflict between humans and humans but now nature is also at it's peak of anger which is again an outcome of our deeds. Why I'm talking about World as one is because in the near future there will be a time where these pieces have to decide whether to collect as one and help to survive the human kind or push each other before the anger of nature and finally collapse.

What World As One will look like? If these 195 pieces are collected together and form an union we can bring out the maximum potential of every part of the world. Like the area near equator can be used just for farming purposes which will help in feeding the whole population of earth. The parts where temperature don't support the growth of crops can be used for settlements. The barren lands can be used to manufacture things with proper technologies and recycling using minimum resources. Universal policies taking consideration of human species. I'm not suggesting to abandon the interest of individual and it's belief, some authority should be watching their interests and suggesting their needs to higher authority but ultimate decision should be taken by the universal bench in the interest of humans.

  I understand what I'm saying appears to be unrealistic and fools word, but will we really have any other choice. I mean there are many policies and rules being made by different organisations to protect environment a way to ask mercy. But how many countries are complying with them? To state the facts, there was a agreement signed in Paris in 2015 which came into force in 2016 every country signed that agreement. That agreement was to bring down the temperature of earth by 1.5 Celsius but the global carbon footprint is increasing without brakes.


If we can't change our current system completely, there should be at least an authority or some power who make sure that these policies are not made just for name sake.

Today if we take human population under consideration nearly 22% of it lives in poverty. There are many organisations taking care of them but the question is - are they efficient at what they do? According to world bank half of them live only in 5 countries of the world. If we know we just need to emphasise on 5 countries and half of the poverty will be over why not 190 countries come together and help them eradicate this problem. Because we are divided among ourselves. Today we can not say, it is because of different race, but because of their backwardness due to their history. These problems would have been come to an end if human start to think as a species and come together for each other.

Can we say UN, can be that ultimate authority? The answer is NO. For the starters it don't have powers to bring justice and maintain international law and order. I know that they are still doing well but the participation of world is not there. Due to conflicts among each other, there's high chance of rejection of policy or bill just because of hatred. It doesn't matter how useful it can be. These dirty politics is also one of the major setback for UN to be a World Government. UN can act as pioneer for such authority but there are many reforms and redistribution of power needed to make it happen, which seems nearly impossible with the on going heat between super powers of our world, as they both are fighting for power and creation of world government is exactly opposite i.e., to give up a portion of power.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Materialism

Toady we are living are having comfortable life when compared to earlier generation. But is it really comfortable? We have softer beds for better sleep, we have air conditioners to tackle adverse climatic conditions, fancy clothes to decorate our outer appearance to the world, we have different devices to playing games and relax our minds etc. These are comforts right? They appear quite ironic to me, air conditioners to tackle adverse climate condition, the conditions which we played with. Playing games on game devices to relax which really increase mental stress in long run. These all are part of materialism. The ideology of materialism states that everything including emotions can be represented physically.  Now, what do you think, to which extent is it valid? There's a saying that money can't buy happiness, which contradicts this theory. Is it really true money can't buy happiness? I believe there are two types of happiness one which last for short duration and other whi...
2 comments
Read more

Unfortunate

About a week or two back, Chinese foreign minister visited Pakistan for OIC meeting. Where he showed his concern about the islamophobia persisting in Western world. The same west, which pampered Islam while changing it's cores, beliefs and created insecurity for it's own use. That insecurity turned into some really unfortunate events, leading to islamophobia. Now the same thing is being repeated, just the actors are changed now. When there was US spreading extremist ideas and insecurity in the Islamic world, now it's China. Well I'm an Indian and Chinese economy do create insecurity in me, it's also true that the actions China is performing to be the global leader involves shaping future of Islamic nations. The often quoted example of Uighur Muslims in Xinxiang stands firm to be an ironic tag in the face of Chinese. While China worries about the mentality in the west regarding Muslims, they often ignore the mental and physical torture of the people of Xinxiang. I be...
Post a Comment
Read more

Drugs As Weapons

We all know, how drugs affect our body, how they make us addict, how small-sighted it makes us and so on. These drugs can be helpful for some people inappropriate amount while prescribed by the doctor. But for an average person, it's harmful. Nowadays, it's cool doing drugs; for gen z, it's like the ultimate stage of being cool. But is it cool? I mean, who told you that it's cool doing drugs? Maybe you don't remember because it's a general idea. But who spread this idea, only someone making money out of it and who was it. They were imperialists earlier.  Do you know there were wars called opium wars? Are you familiar with them? It's clear from the name that opium was a reason somehow. So, this war was between China and the Britishers. The Chinese market was not open to foreign powers, and they investigate imports via a single port. So, to open a call to them, Britishers smuggled opium in China along with their other goods. They made the Chinese population ad...
Post a Comment
Read more