Skip to main content

Nothing Stays Supreme Forever

Each and every process in this multiverse or beyond works according to a pattern, with certain rules, within limits. Many of these laws are interpreted by humans explaining their working. In fact, many phenomenon are predicted on the basis of that. But their very existence is still a question, yeah, I know there's a theory known as Big Bang Theory but it's still have a lot to prove and the particle in which that explosion occurred is still a big question. To simplify things to explain things for us, lets say some power decides the law how things work naming it nature because we gonna talk about political issues with some help of science. And the term nature will work just fine for us .



This nature likes to experiment with everything that exists. So, it tries different types of approach to discover new things. Whenever this experiments reach at saturation it tries different approach to continue its experiment. As a result anything that exist never stays supreme forever. When something stays supreme for a long time it stops giving result with time and nature have to change things to note different readings.

These points are valid from macro to micro levels of this world too. Whether we talk in scientific terms taking 5 mass extinction on earth into consideration, in which dominating species of that time turned into minerals, or talking in social hierarchy which developed from monarchical system to power in the hands of people. 

There was a time when church was not just a religious authority but had political powers too. No one could question its authority and people use to follow them too and got exploited. With time and development of certain circumstances it was striped off from it's political power and only religious influence was left with it. Same happened to every ideology which tried to expand. One can say in the ancient times India was superior when compared to other locations of the world. But with time India become politically unstable and got colonized.

The country which colonized Britain, was ultimate power at that time. Where is it today? If we talk about it's GDP before Corona Virus Pandemic, it was at 6th position even below India. America was a land where prisoners were escorted, has hegemony over world.

We I talk about a controversial topic; there was a time when men and only men had power, rights and women were nothing in men's eye. Now there are many countries which are being lead by women and their will increase with time. There will be a time when women will lead this planet. I'm not saying it's going to happen in short time, it'll be take a lot of time but they'll lead world, it's inevitable. Men will fight to maintain his grip over power but it'll be chaotic if men didn't accept that truth when the time comes.


We can consider the ongoing tension in world order. It's been 31 years as of now, we are under hegemony of United States. Now China being a super power trying claim it's hegemony over Asia. Which will destroy absolute hegemony of US. The outcome will be decrease in the power of US it won't matter how will the results be. If China succeeds in it's plan, US will share power. If US wants to win it will need an ally and US have to share it's power if they won. Ultimately US will share just the amount of power it share will differ depending on the result. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brilliant Minds

What comes to your mind when we speak of brilliant minds? Albert Einstein? Stephan Hawking? Vinton Cerf? Bob Kahn? There are many names to say. Did they acquire that keen mind of their or they trained them? The thing is, we cannot be sure. After all, science has its language and so makes minds. Two types of mind one innately possess extraordinary capabilities and others who train themselves and push their limits. Nevertheless, these limits can be pushed to some extent only after that saturation comes or, say, and it went out of our hands. A movie named 'A man who knew infinity is based on the life of Srinivas Ramanujan. He was good with the number and contributed a lot in the field of Mathematics. However, what intriguing was that he was not trained or lectured by anyone. Moreover, on the contrary, there was G.H hardy who identified his work and helped him contribute to humanity. I am trying to say that if one deems to a person out of the above two, who will it be? My guess is Srin
1 comment
Read more

World As one

 For the very first post, this topic isn't that bad I think. What I mean when I say World as one? It's simple sounding idea of creation of a universal system over world which make our world an egalitarian world. A world where we talk about about the future of human kind not the future of an individual race. Today, our world is politically divided into 195 pieces, calling individual piece a country. These pieces are interconnected in a very complex way every piece of this world get affected by the action of one, it obviously differ in intensity, duration, outcomes but this system sure impact every part of the world we can take the example of current conflict going on between Palestinians and Israelis. Whatever may be the reason of this conflicts whole world is getting affected by this, like barrier in the economic front as Israel exports high-technologies, cut diamond, etc to other parts of the world all these have to stop including the imports Israel bought affecting the econom
Post a Comment
Read more

Were Armchair Scientist Right?

In this post, we will take a basic derivation of  Natural Selection -  a theory by  Charles Darwin.  The armchair scientist is a term used for thinkers who depend on the researches provided to them. They interpret the work of others and try to give them shape for other causes.  To start with, Charles Darwin wasn't one of them. He visited many areas and collected and sorted different types of samples. And gave a theory that changed our view of ours to see the course of evolution. He set us on the path to untangle the mystery of the diversity of life. One of the theories is Natural Selection or survival of the fittest.   This theory says an organism that adapts to the changes in the environment better will have more chances to survive and stand against the odds. This theory unravelled the mystery of evolution; at least gave a direction towards it. This answered many questions; one such was -  Is the rule of Britishers overseas justified? As a patriot, the answer is  NO! , but for a m
Post a Comment
Read more