Skip to main content

Aligned Unity

The single biggest threat roaming around the heads of animals of this planet is Climate Change. I don't feel the need to state data what would happen if temperature rises above 1.5 deg. Celsius or any other figure. But one thing is true whatever is coming for us is dangerous. So, to counter this, Countries are assembling together to invest in green technology, clean fuels, etc. etc. let us keep the word green investment for all of this.

Now, coming to the point of scrutiny of these development taking place, we can see the pattern of protectionism and imperialism in some areas. Let's take an example to justify my assertion, let us say European Union or any west country develops some sort of high tech machinery which dumps Carbon into ground and allows us to extract it back when required, or say nuclear fusion technology achieves exothermic stage by a single country. This country must have invested some amount to develop these tech, so it's obvious they will sought return on their investment. So they started demanding premium royalty on their product, but every nation couldn't afford to buy this and may end up giving up sovereignty rights. All these are surely based on assumptions with lot of "ifs" and "mays" but still not unimaginable.

Now here comes the another hypothesis, what if there were no boundaries existing between the nations, the every term of nation losses relevance for our civilization. What shall happen then? Many may argue that would mean stripping off the every sovereignty I was defending in previous discussion. The difference between the two remains that in the first case sovereignty of a nation was being surrendered to the some other nation. But in the world with no boundaries, we all would enjoy a single sovereignty, the SOVEREIGN EARTH.

There's a lot more to add, but given the size of existing discussion let's head towards the concluding remarks. The boundaries which all of us are too proud of naming it Patriotism, created by our ancestors, and we are still continuing their wishes to hold the boundaries, these persons already found peace and residing in graves and it doesn't matter much to them whether we are still believing in idea of Nation States or not. We are the new generation, with new spirit, new ideas, new problems, when everything is new why should we solve problem old style?

I strongly believe, we humans should amend the evil mentality of division into aligned unity to grow into the most prosperous creation of cosmos.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brilliant Minds

What comes to your mind when we speak of brilliant minds? Albert Einstein? Stephan Hawking? Vinton Cerf? Bob Kahn? There are many names to say. Did they acquire that keen mind of their or they trained them? The thing is, we cannot be sure. After all, science has its language and so makes minds. Two types of mind one innately possess extraordinary capabilities and others who train themselves and push their limits. Nevertheless, these limits can be pushed to some extent only after that saturation comes or, say, and it went out of our hands. A movie named 'A man who knew infinity is based on the life of Srinivas Ramanujan. He was good with the number and contributed a lot in the field of Mathematics. However, what intriguing was that he was not trained or lectured by anyone. Moreover, on the contrary, there was G.H hardy who identified his work and helped him contribute to humanity. I am trying to say that if one deems to a person out of the above two, who will it be? My guess is Srin...
1 comment
Read more

Were Armchair Scientist Right?

In this post, we will take a basic derivation of  Natural Selection -  a theory by  Charles Darwin.  The armchair scientist is a term used for thinkers who depend on the researches provided to them. They interpret the work of others and try to give them shape for other causes.  To start with, Charles Darwin wasn't one of them. He visited many areas and collected and sorted different types of samples. And gave a theory that changed our view of ours to see the course of evolution. He set us on the path to untangle the mystery of the diversity of life. One of the theories is Natural Selection or survival of the fittest.   This theory says an organism that adapts to the changes in the environment better will have more chances to survive and stand against the odds. This theory unravelled the mystery of evolution; at least gave a direction towards it. This answered many questions; one such was -  Is the rule of Britishers overseas justified? As a patriot, th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Materialism

Toady we are living are having comfortable life when compared to earlier generation. But is it really comfortable? We have softer beds for better sleep, we have air conditioners to tackle adverse climatic conditions, fancy clothes to decorate our outer appearance to the world, we have different devices to playing games and relax our minds etc. These are comforts right? They appear quite ironic to me, air conditioners to tackle adverse climate condition, the conditions which we played with. Playing games on game devices to relax which really increase mental stress in long run. These all are part of materialism. The ideology of materialism states that everything including emotions can be represented physically.  Now, what do you think, to which extent is it valid? There's a saying that money can't buy happiness, which contradicts this theory. Is it really true money can't buy happiness? I believe there are two types of happiness one which last for short duration and other whi...
2 comments
Read more